Impact Factor: 6.78 Journal Quality Score (JQS): 85.34
    Email Id: chiefeditor.ijeel@gmail.com
    Impact Factor: 6.78 Journal Quality Score (JQS): 85.34
    Email Id: chiefeditor.ijeel@gmail.com

    Problem Situations as Epistemological Foundations: A Comparative Analysis of Chinese Curriculum Standards and International Frameworks

    Journal Article
    Author(s)
    Dagui Wu, Yunyun Zhang
    Keywords
    problem situation, Chinese curriculum standards, comparative analysis, epistemology, mathematization
    Abstract
    The concept of "problem situation" occupies a central position in Chinese mathematics curriculum standards. Rather than treating situations as mere decorative backgrounds for mathematical problems, the Chinese curriculum imbues them with a generative epistemological role, serving as the soil from which mathematical knowledge grows. This paper examines this distinctive conception through comparative analysis with four major international theoretical traditions: PISA's mathematical literacy framework, Brousseau's Theory of Didactical Situations, Freudenthal's Realistic Mathematics Education, and Lave and Wenger's theory of situated learning. The analysis reveals that the Chinese curriculum's treatment of problem situations is unique in simultaneously positioning them as cognitive activities, instructional goals, and instructional approaches. This triple function resonates with but also diverges from international perspectives. Furthermore, the Chinese curriculum distinguishes three types of situations (real-world, mathematical, and scientific), each of which entails distinct epistemological demands: mathematization for real-world situations, formalization for mathematical situations, and modeling for scientific situations. The paper traces how this three-fold typology develops across educational stages from elementary to senior high school and argues that the Chinese curriculum's conception of problem situations offers productive contributions to international mathematics education discourse.
    References

    Blum, U. (2015). Quality teaching of mathematical modelling: What do we know, what can we do? In Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 73–96). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12688-3_9

    Blum, U., & Leiß, D. (2007). How do students and teachers deal with modelling problems? In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modelling (ICTMA 12) (pp. 222–231). Horwood Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857099419.5.221

    Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics (N. Cooper & R. Sutherland, Trans. and Eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (2005). The art of problem posing (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Cai, J., & Hwang, S. (Eds.). (2022). Problem posing in mathematics education: Current research and future directions. Springer.

    Cai, J., & Rott, B. (2024). On understanding mathematical problem-posing processes. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 56(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01536-w

    Cai, J., Wang, T., & Xie, S. (2025). Mathematical problem posing in Chinese curriculum standards. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 4(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263251340993

    Ding, M., Wu, Y., Liu, Q., & Cai, J. (2022). Mathematics learning in Chinese contexts. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 54(3), 477–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01385-z

    Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355

    Leung, F. K. S. (2001). In search of an East Asian identity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 35–51.https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1017936429620

    Li, M., & Xu, B. (2021). The development of problem-posing in Chinese mathematics curriculum. In J. Cai & S. Hwang (Eds.), Problem posing in mathematics education: Current research and future directions (pp. 53–66). Springer.

    Liljedahl, P., & Cai, J. (2021). Empirical research on problem solving and problem posing: A look at the state of the art. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 53(4), 723–735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01291-w

    Ministry of Education. (2020). Senior high school mathematics curriculum standards (2017 edition, 2019 revision) [普通高中数学课程标准(2017年版2019年修订)]. People's Education Press.

    Ministry of Education. (2022). Mathematics curriculum standards for compulsory education (2022 edition) [义务教育数学课程标准(2022年版)]. Beijing Normal University Press.

    OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 mathematics framework. OECD Publishing.

    Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1945)

    Silver, E. A., & Cai, J. (1996). An analysis of arithmetic problem posing by middle school students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(5), 521–539. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.27.5.0521

    Zhang, M., Lin, D., Tian, Y., & Liu, X. (2025). Changes in problem contexts in middle school mathematics textbooks: A longitudinal comparative study of equation topics in China. HAL Open Science Archive. https://hal.science/hal-05463753/

    How to Cite
    Loading APA citation...
    Article Details
    Published 13 Aug 2026
    DOI 10.22161/ijeel.5.4.9
    Pages 81-95
    Views 9
    Downloads 1
    Full Text Access