Impact Factor: 6.78 Journal Quality Score (JQS): 85.34
    Email Id: chiefeditor.ijeel@gmail.com
    Impact Factor: 6.78 Journal Quality Score (JQS): 85.34
    Email Id: chiefeditor.ijeel@gmail.com

    Existential Absurdities, Ethical Resilience and Modern Nihilism in Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot

    Journal Article
    Author(s)
    Dr. Abhilasha Rohilla
    Keywords
    Absurdity, Existentialism, Modern Nihilism, Ethical Resilience, Philosophical Ambiguity, Existential Crisis, Waiting, Godot, Vladimir, Estragon, Repetition, Circularity, Meaninglessness, Alienation, Human Existence, Time, Uncertainty, Hope and Theatre of the Absurd.
    Abstract
    “Astride of a grave and a difficult birth. Down in the hole, lingeringly, the gravedigger puts on the forceps.” — Vladimir (Act 2) Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot is one of the most influential dramatic works of the twentieth century and a defining text of the Theatre of the Absurd. First performed in the early 1950s, the play presents two apparently homeless figures, Vladimir and Estragon, who spend an indeterminate period waiting for a mysterious figure named Godot, who never arrives. Through its circular structure, repetitive dialogue, fragmented communication, comic routines, and deliberate absence of conventional dramatic progression, the play challenges traditional assumptions about plot, character, time, purpose, and meaning. This research article offers a general analysis of the enduring absurdity represented in Waiting for Godot, focusing on the existential, philosophical, psychological, and theatrical dimensions of Beckett’s dramatic vision. The paper purposely states that the absurdity of the play does not arise merely from the strange circumstances of waiting but from the fundamental human desire to discover meaning in a world that repeatedly refuses to provide definitive answers. The play’s cyclical movement and repetition undermine the conventional notion of linear time, suggesting that human beings may remain trapped within recurring patterns of expectation and disappointment. Pozzo and Lucky add further dimensions of power, domination, dependency, suffering, and social inequality to the play’s existential landscape. The paper also examines Beckett’s use of silence, pauses, comic elements, minimal setting, and unconventional dialogue as theatrical strategies that transform philosophical uncertainty into a performative experience. Ultimately, Waiting for Godot remains enduring because its absurdity transcends its historical moment: it reflects the continuing human struggle to discover purpose, certainty, connection, and hope amid an uncertain existence.
    References

    Beckett, Samuel. Waiting for Godot. Grove Press, 1954.

    Beckett, Samuel. Waiting for Godot: A Tragicomedy in Two Acts. Translated by the author, Grove Press, 1954.

    Camus, Albert. The Myth of Sisyphus and Other Essays. Translated by Justin O'Brien, Vintage International, 1991.

    Camus, Albert. The Myth of Sisyphus. Vintage, 1955.

    Esslin, Martin. The Theatre of the Absurd. 3rd ed., Vintage Books, 2004.

    Fletcher, John. The Novels of Samuel Beckett. Chatto & Windus, 1964.

    Knowlson, James. Damned to Fame: The Life of Samuel Beckett. Simon & Schuster, 1996.

    McDonald, Ronan. The Cambridge Introduction to Samuel Beckett. Cambridge UP, 2006.

    Pattie, David. The Complete Critical Guide to Samuel Beckett. Routledge, 2000.

    Sartre, Jean-Paul. Existentialism Is a Humanism. Translated by Carol Macomber, Yale UP, 2007.

    Webb, Eugene. The Plays of Samuel Beckett. University of Washington Press, 1974.

    Worth, Katharine. Samuel Beckett's Theatre: Life, Language, and Death. 2nd ed., Methuen, 1999.

    How to Cite
    Loading APA citation...
    Article Details
    Published 16 Sep 2026
    DOI 10.22161/ijeel.5.5.2
    Pages 15-28
    Views 35
    Downloads 1
    Full Text Access